1 Comment

David, they can get away with it because there are NO PRINCIPALS in the case, and everybody is presumed to be acting in agency for their fictions. Perhaps something like

David Jonathan Tulis, Principal

Private party

v.

Brandon Bennett, Principal

Private party

That way, if an "attorney" should appear you can have the defendants declared incompetent and in default if they do not answer the claim THEMSELVES, as Principals. Anyone "appearing" through agency should immediately be added as a defendant and Principal in the claim they answer.

You have to remove them from the protection of their statutory courts where ANYTHING THEY SAY IS LAW. You are trying to operate under the Law jurisdiction, while they operate under "statutory" jurisdiction. You must plainly put all parties in the same, proper, jurisdiction, and keep them there.

You are NOT a plaintiff, and they are not defendants, or any other statutory term they may use. And also stay away from "common law" because that is a part of the "statutory jurisdiction". Make your claims through Natural Law, through your INHERENT right to do so, and bring them through the TN constitution.

If the state is paying for the defense, they are "state agents" and you WILL LOSE because they WILL IGNORE THE LAW.

Did you notice the Copyright on the Tennessee Codes you showed a picture of the other day? And did you know the "annotations" that are in the "official" versions are not available to private parties? Did you know that legalese being used to write "statutes" makes them void for vagueness due to the fraudulent use of words and redefining them?

The codes that make them agents are void for multiple reasons, and with that their claim of state agency is void against Principals, and beyond their own reach as Principals themselves.

Standing is everything, and putting them in the proper box through the complaint will keep them in that box for the duration.

Expand full comment