Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
0:00
/
0:00
Transcript
2

Caught 'in flagrante delicto' in mass ripoff of poor, 2 TN chiefs get summonses

TN is not a mandatory insurance state; only people with suspended licenses and conditional use of privilege required to have it; scandal began 2002, with Part 2 in 2017
2

CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Friday, Nov. 1, 2024 — A quick read of my newest prosecution of the wicked starts on p. 1 of my 93pp complaint before the Tennessee three-judge panel.

Legally, the crucial point is that only certified motor vehicle liability insurance policies can be required, and only people under suspension can get a certified policy.

Regular policies (owner’s, operator’s) don’t qualify as proof of financial responsibility. Yet people are forced to buy them, a gift to the insurance cartel. Up to F$2 billion in free premiums a year.

My suit, I believe puts criminal operators in high office under pressure because they are so far astray from what T.C.A. 55-12-101 and 201 et seq say. Rogue program, Mass harm for 22 years, under Democrat and GOP administrations, and no one is seeing it until today.

Abstract of State ex rel. Tulis filing toay

The Tennessee department of revenue is administering the Atwood amendment at T.C.A. § 55-12-201 et seq as a harm to the public by forcing 100 percent of registered motor vehicle owners to buy insurance or obtain “proof of financial responsibility” outside the scope of the law.

It demands they buy operator’s or owner’s policies, none of which meet the statutory requirement that they be certified motor vehicle liability policies as defined at T.C.A. § 55-12-102 and -122 in the Tennessee financial responsibility law of 1977, and meeting standards laid out at § 55-12-202. Respondents claim authority for “mandatory insurance” from T.C.A. § 55-12-139 and have made Tennessee a mandatory insurance state since 2002 without authority.

The only persons required to have proof of financial responsibility are those whose licenses and/or tags are revoked under a conviction or court judgment, or because they fail to report to commissioner of safety a qualifying accident. T.C.A. § 55-12-104. Relator has a good driving record and no qualifying accident. DOR revokes his tag illegally, in violation of due process rights.

In short: Respondents threaten members of the public into buying insurance they cannot afford to obtain policies that no one can certify as legal proof of financial responsibility.

Join me in mercy as I fight to end oppression of poor. GiveSendGo

Discussion about this podcast

David Tulis & TNtrafficticket
Local economy & free markets
I cover local economy and free markets in Chattanooga and beyond, with a focus on making officials obey constitution and law and encouraging Christian rebuilding.