A "Trial by jury request" to a statutory court will get a you a "statutory jury trial" where the jury sits there and the judge tells them how to rule. In order to matter, there can be no participation from the state to do anything other than provide the place, the Sheriff to oversee the proceedings, and the Clerk of Court to Seal them.
The Trial By Jury mean the jury tries the facts, the law, AND the Justice of the law. And they do so with ZERO input from the state or it's criminal officers. Otherwise, it's just the government trying the government and you will lose 100% of the time.
The entire purpose of a Trial by Jury is to give the people themselves the FINAL SAY in what they will allow government to do. You continue to plead to the criminals to follow the Law and protect the people, but that is contrary to their purpose which is to plunder them.
Your arguments are 100% correct and in a fair and just system you would prevail. And if you could present your case directly to the people, without the government jury and evidence tampering, you would also prevail. ALL EFFORT must be to force them to provide you with a Jury of YOUR PEERS (12 random people off the street) to hear the case OUTSIDE of the states fraud.
Thank you. Yes, we have Demanded Trial By Jury, Constitutional Common Law Court of Record,… all ignored, even by Federal “courts” on Removal for obvious Deprivations where Questions of Constitutional import or Piints of law go neglected because federal & State Courts refuse to recognize or understand our Constitutional Common Law: www.YouTube.com/user/kornkobiowa
The State can’t differentiate between riding a horse and driving cattle, a pedestrian from an “Operator,” or “Driver.”
The "common law" is a part of the statutory jurisdiction. The people sit OUTSIDE of that system. the ONLY claim their court should ever get to hear is the one you file against the Sheriff and Clerk of Court when they refuse to follow the constitution. The ONLY relief sought is to force them to uphold the constitution. The subject matter of the case you are trying to bring before the Jury doesn't matter. It is forcing the proceeding itself to happen.
First step I would suggest is to write a commencing document for the case, to be brought DIRECTLY to the People of Tennessee, through the constitutional functions of the Sheriffs office. Place it in a sealed and Notarized envelope. Then approach the Sheriff and tell him to assemble a Jury to present the case to. Record him laughing at your request he follow the law and his honor his Oath.
There are only three people that can participate. They are the constitutional officers, (Sheriff, Clerk of Court, and Judge), no one else can participate other than the Jury. Once they refuse to honor the constitution and their oath of office, then you have a proper cause of action OUTSIDE of their administrative procedures. The sole relief you are seeking is the assembly of an INDEPENDENT JURY free from tampering by government agents to try your sealed case.
Will they listen then? Possibly because you have forced them outside of their "statutory framework" they claim supports their criminality. If the true nature of the case is unknown to the court, pending disclosure to the jury, they may be less inclined to act criminally. And if they do, they can simple be added to the case as defendants.
Lastly, you must ALWAYS identify yourself in EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT as the Principal, as that status is reserved in Article I Section 1 and it is the ONLY identification you can use. Everybody else will be an agent of the state, answering to you as the Principal. In a perfect world....
Are the odds good? No. Are they better than trying to fight the statutes you are not a subject to to begin with. Way better. The people lose because they pick the wrong fights and nobody is on the same page.
People will follow a good example. Because most people are visual learners we need to see examples, templates, a sample case … thank you for your insight
I am working on MY case right now. People who merely follow examples are not competent to succeed. There is no template for you to defend yourself against criminals. Your battle is not the same as mine.
Having said that, you do what YOU THINK should work to achieve the goal of an actual, real life, Trial By Jury. Those who are going to lose are those who do not start protecting themselves until AFTER they have been caught in the trap. My intent is to establish the fraud of government BEFORE I get stopped and assaulted by the criminal cop. By doing so I have an affirmative defense to ANY statutory claim because they are rooted in the fraud of government itself, separate and distinct from the people it victimizes.
I simply suggest an alternative strategy. DO NOT fight them over their statutes. Protect yourself from them, and force the Clerk of Court to issue and seal an order that either confirms the government is legitimate (honors the constitution) or not (pushes statutes as "law"). There will be no middle ground offered. You are there for GENERAL PROTECTION from the statutory crimes of government officers, so there is no particular statute to enforce. And if the Clerk refuses (likely), my case has already been made and won.
A government that is 99% legitimate is still illegitimate if it is one percent criminal. Ours is 1% legitimate and 99% criminal. That should make it very easy to prove, with self evident facts that no government officer will address and that people can't help but notice as it's victims.
Some other items to consider...
ALL statutes are void for several reasons, among them Vagueness, they are privately copyrighted, they are written in a foreign language of fraud, critical information (the "annotations" used by the criminals in court) is withheld from the public.
The US constitution is similarly void for several reasons. Among them fraud because it was not authorized. It is also void for vagueness as it is nothing but a collection of Barnum Statements, proven and self evident by the fact that the Supreme court almost NEVER agrees on what it says. It was ratified at gunpoint in more than one state, according to their own records.
The Tennessee constitution was also created by the military government installed by the northern criminals after an unlawful war waged by the US against the free people of the Confederacy that VOTED TO LEAVE the union.
The bottom line, don't fight their codes. That gives them legitimacy. Your are outside of the codes, and you must get the government people to where you are. Pursuing a "secret case" gives them ONLY the lawful procedure they are required to follow, and no excuse for not allowing it.
A "Trial by jury request" to a statutory court will get a you a "statutory jury trial" where the jury sits there and the judge tells them how to rule. In order to matter, there can be no participation from the state to do anything other than provide the place, the Sheriff to oversee the proceedings, and the Clerk of Court to Seal them.
The Trial By Jury mean the jury tries the facts, the law, AND the Justice of the law. And they do so with ZERO input from the state or it's criminal officers. Otherwise, it's just the government trying the government and you will lose 100% of the time.
The entire purpose of a Trial by Jury is to give the people themselves the FINAL SAY in what they will allow government to do. You continue to plead to the criminals to follow the Law and protect the people, but that is contrary to their purpose which is to plunder them.
Your arguments are 100% correct and in a fair and just system you would prevail. And if you could present your case directly to the people, without the government jury and evidence tampering, you would also prevail. ALL EFFORT must be to force them to provide you with a Jury of YOUR PEERS (12 random people off the street) to hear the case OUTSIDE of the states fraud.
Thank you. Yes, we have Demanded Trial By Jury, Constitutional Common Law Court of Record,… all ignored, even by Federal “courts” on Removal for obvious Deprivations where Questions of Constitutional import or Piints of law go neglected because federal & State Courts refuse to recognize or understand our Constitutional Common Law: www.YouTube.com/user/kornkobiowa
The State can’t differentiate between riding a horse and driving cattle, a pedestrian from an “Operator,” or “Driver.”
The "common law" is a part of the statutory jurisdiction. The people sit OUTSIDE of that system. the ONLY claim their court should ever get to hear is the one you file against the Sheriff and Clerk of Court when they refuse to follow the constitution. The ONLY relief sought is to force them to uphold the constitution. The subject matter of the case you are trying to bring before the Jury doesn't matter. It is forcing the proceeding itself to happen.
First step I would suggest is to write a commencing document for the case, to be brought DIRECTLY to the People of Tennessee, through the constitutional functions of the Sheriffs office. Place it in a sealed and Notarized envelope. Then approach the Sheriff and tell him to assemble a Jury to present the case to. Record him laughing at your request he follow the law and his honor his Oath.
There are only three people that can participate. They are the constitutional officers, (Sheriff, Clerk of Court, and Judge), no one else can participate other than the Jury. Once they refuse to honor the constitution and their oath of office, then you have a proper cause of action OUTSIDE of their administrative procedures. The sole relief you are seeking is the assembly of an INDEPENDENT JURY free from tampering by government agents to try your sealed case.
Will they listen then? Possibly because you have forced them outside of their "statutory framework" they claim supports their criminality. If the true nature of the case is unknown to the court, pending disclosure to the jury, they may be less inclined to act criminally. And if they do, they can simple be added to the case as defendants.
Lastly, you must ALWAYS identify yourself in EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT as the Principal, as that status is reserved in Article I Section 1 and it is the ONLY identification you can use. Everybody else will be an agent of the state, answering to you as the Principal. In a perfect world....
Are the odds good? No. Are they better than trying to fight the statutes you are not a subject to to begin with. Way better. The people lose because they pick the wrong fights and nobody is on the same page.
People will follow a good example. Because most people are visual learners we need to see examples, templates, a sample case … thank you for your insight
I am working on MY case right now. People who merely follow examples are not competent to succeed. There is no template for you to defend yourself against criminals. Your battle is not the same as mine.
Having said that, you do what YOU THINK should work to achieve the goal of an actual, real life, Trial By Jury. Those who are going to lose are those who do not start protecting themselves until AFTER they have been caught in the trap. My intent is to establish the fraud of government BEFORE I get stopped and assaulted by the criminal cop. By doing so I have an affirmative defense to ANY statutory claim because they are rooted in the fraud of government itself, separate and distinct from the people it victimizes.
I simply suggest an alternative strategy. DO NOT fight them over their statutes. Protect yourself from them, and force the Clerk of Court to issue and seal an order that either confirms the government is legitimate (honors the constitution) or not (pushes statutes as "law"). There will be no middle ground offered. You are there for GENERAL PROTECTION from the statutory crimes of government officers, so there is no particular statute to enforce. And if the Clerk refuses (likely), my case has already been made and won.
A government that is 99% legitimate is still illegitimate if it is one percent criminal. Ours is 1% legitimate and 99% criminal. That should make it very easy to prove, with self evident facts that no government officer will address and that people can't help but notice as it's victims.
Some other items to consider...
ALL statutes are void for several reasons, among them Vagueness, they are privately copyrighted, they are written in a foreign language of fraud, critical information (the "annotations" used by the criminals in court) is withheld from the public.
The US constitution is similarly void for several reasons. Among them fraud because it was not authorized. It is also void for vagueness as it is nothing but a collection of Barnum Statements, proven and self evident by the fact that the Supreme court almost NEVER agrees on what it says. It was ratified at gunpoint in more than one state, according to their own records.
The Tennessee constitution was also created by the military government installed by the northern criminals after an unlawful war waged by the US against the free people of the Confederacy that VOTED TO LEAVE the union.
The bottom line, don't fight their codes. That gives them legitimacy. Your are outside of the codes, and you must get the government people to where you are. Pursuing a "secret case" gives them ONLY the lawful procedure they are required to follow, and no excuse for not allowing it.