This whole case has been hinky from the very start! How is it that Mr. Ray is found guilty when the State reinstated his right the keep and bear arms on no less than 55 separate occasions? The local Sheriffs department will no doubt profiteer from the sale of this man's rare and expensive gun collection after decades of allowing him to purchase weapons with NO history of a felony conviction. When did this new-found "felony" first get put into NCIC? What this a prosecutorial misuse of previously expunged judicial records? This case should be reviewed by the Appellate Court sua sponte, this has WAY too many questions that were not properly answered or addressed!
Welcomed news.
This whole case has been hinky from the very start! How is it that Mr. Ray is found guilty when the State reinstated his right the keep and bear arms on no less than 55 separate occasions? The local Sheriffs department will no doubt profiteer from the sale of this man's rare and expensive gun collection after decades of allowing him to purchase weapons with NO history of a felony conviction. When did this new-found "felony" first get put into NCIC? What this a prosecutorial misuse of previously expunged judicial records? This case should be reviewed by the Appellate Court sua sponte, this has WAY too many questions that were not properly answered or addressed!