Will Judge Crenshaw grant emergency hearing?
Preliminary injunction calls for immediate hearing in face of immient harm to me and to 12,000 people a week getting fraudulent threat notices by department of revenue
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Friday, Dec. 20, 2024 — Lynda Hill is the clerk of the U.S. district court in Nashville. I call her near closing time today to that I’m demanding a preliminary injunction which is an “emergency measure due an immediate hearing.”
The clerk’s office “has absolutely nothing to do with the legal nature of the claims of any filing but it’s merely the administrator of the papers.”
“I understand Mr. Tulis, I have – the clerk’s office and me is the clerk have absolutely zero control over the judge’s docket and when they choose to or are able to review matters.”
When getting an emergency petition, she says, “We will, if asked, alert chambers. But they receive a notice every day when cases are filed and matters are filed, and I have every confidence that the judge is aware of it. But unfortunately I can’t give you any indication.”
She assigns a fault to my petition. “It doesn’t say anything about it being an emergency or anything like that.”
I attempt to explain that I have a “Younger abstention” controversy that must be settled first. I contend the federal rule of nonintervention in state proceedings doesn’t apply because my proceedings in agency — in revenue for 16 months — are void because the department has no authority to hold hearings whatsoever under TFRL, the financial responsibility law.
As she speak I am thinking that I must file a motion for an emergency hearing. “I am happy to alert his staff that you have reached out and that you consider it urgent. But that’s the best I can do. *** I will bring into the staff’s attention that you called.”
David runs a personal nonprofit fighting and mercy ministry. He thanks you for checks sent directly to c/o 10520 Brickhill Lane, Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379. Also, in GiveSendGo: