Turn cop into nincompoop by asking about ‘essential elements’ of ‘driving’
Telegram interview with Gary Brown's "Legal Beagles"show reveals recommended scripts
The Legal Beagle show on Telegram opens a useful window in defeating abusive cops and “commercial government” that tyrannizes Americans, belittles them and makes of them contemptible boobs.
The Telegram interview is about questions to ask the cop, deputy or trooper who is your accuser and whom you now have on the stand. State government, the movant in your criminal case, is using him as its agent and witness against you to convict you of a “traffic case.” I propose the case can be defeated if you force the witness and his charging instrument to show he has no evidence that you are involved in the activity subject to the law he is enforcing.
He is enforcing your state’s so-called “motor vehicle” law, which has in view the transportation, trucking and hauling industry, whether of goods or passengers. The transportation law, overly applied, is one of many modern abuses of Americans, and probably people in every country. Private travel is commercialized under rebuttable presumption.
Your job, now that you stand here in court, is to force him to reveal what evidence he has that you, a soccer mom taking kids to practice, or a senior citizen visiting an old school chum in a retirement home, are involved in trucking.
30 questions showing cop lacks evidence
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you inspected the interior of my automobile
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you saw property inside the car?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you saw a person other than me in the car?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that the woman was a guest?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that she was a passenger?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you have been trained to perceive a difference btween a guest or rider on one hand and a passenger on the other?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that the property and effects in the front and back seats of the car were cargo?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that the “household goods” you saw in the back seat meet the definition of “personal belongings transported from one residence to another by a motor carrier?” (TCA 65-15-102 definitions)
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you seized, examined documents in the nature of bills of lading for cargo?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you asked to see bills of lading?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you, in noting the effects in the back seat, compared these items with a waybill?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you asked to see waybills for cargo?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you reviewed such contracts?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you asked to see contracts for the carrying of cargo for hire
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you asked to see contracts for the carrying of passengers for hire?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you inspected cargo manifests?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you seized cargo manifests?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you inspected passenger manifests?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you seized passenger manifests?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you demanded to see either type of these manifests?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you made a determination that the accused is an employer using the public road for private profit and gain as a carrier?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that the accused is an employee, hired by an owner or employer to carry goods or people for hire as part of employment?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that the accused is a servant, hired by an owner or employer to carry goods or people for hire under an hourly contract?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you obtained proofs of the accused’s operating as a motor carrier upon the public highway for the transportation of persons? (TCA 65-15-102 definitions)
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you obtained proofs of the accused’s operating as a motor carrier upon the public highway for the transportation of property? (TCA 65-15-102 definitions)
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that the seizure of the accused was a transportation stop?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that accused's occupation or vocation is that of motor vehicle operator?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that the accused’s calling is that of motor vehicle driver?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that accused was operating that day as a common carrier?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that the accused was operating a motor vehicle as a private carrier?
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you asked the accused for his logbook.
Do you have any evidence you can testify to that you or your employer are not subject to << statewide privilege not enforceable by municipality>>