Magistrate says delay financial responsibility case; I urge U.S. judge to let me fight for justice
40,800 false convictions under T.C.A. § 55-12-139(C)(4) makes streets unsafe for the public, converting cops, deputies into predators, bandits, I tell Judge Crenshaw
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Saturday, Aril 19, 2025 — A federal magistrate, Barbara Holmes, urges a federal judge to stay prosecution of my prosecution of the commissioner of revenue, David Gerregano, and the department of revenue on grounds of federal respect for state legal proceedings.
On Monday, the clerk at the federal court at 719 Church St. in Nashville will get by U.S. mail my 20-page response to this 12-page opinion regarding the so-called “Younger doctrine” of abstention.
I argue that proceedings in my 20-month-old state administrative case are not legitimate, are without statutory basis, that I am denied a hearing and the prospect of relief in these proceedings, that the state has no interest in fraud and oppression and that the federal case to blinker “The Eye of Sauron” rightly must continue.
Mr. Gerregano runs EIVS, the electronic insurance verification system as part of a private operation and a criminal enterprise. The federal government should intervene and allow the case.
In a nutshell —————–
➤ Federal intervention proper because state system rogue
➤ TN admin. hearings are void, apart from law
➤ Don’t defer to criminal enterprise under color of law
The presiding judge is Waverly Crenshaw, a man whose life experiences as a black have been subsumed by his enrobement in office, and no natural sympathy for the poor oppressed black or other is likely to have any influence on his discretion in this case.
My main argument is that my 20 months of administrative litigation in agency account for nothing, are not authentic, not appealable, void as a matter of law, and thus constitute no proceeding in a state that the federal court must respect under Younger.
I am suing in a “contested case” to get the tag back on my 2000 Honda Odyssey minivan, worth F$400 and with 300,000 miles under it and many more tens of thousands of miles ahead in personal service to the Tulis family of Soddy-Daisy.
I also argue that even if the case vs. revenue and the commissioner in official capacity are stayed, I am suing him personally. He personally is in no proceeding regarding EIVS, and so I can continue to demand relief as against him. This relief is that he cease his arbitrary and capricious program and return once again to his office and operation of law.
HOLMES: “[T]he state of Tennessee unquestionably has an important state interest in matters relating to the operation of motor vehicles and the well-being of [motorists] on its roadways and in enforcing the statutes and policies it has enacted to this effect. Plaintiff raises no argument to the contrary.” (PageID# 501)
Note the above quote from magistrate Holmes, and my response on the question of “state interest.” Younger says the feds can’t intervene upon a “state interest.”
TULIS: The Sixth Circuit has found important state interests in multiple contexts: from maintaining and assuring the professional conduct of attorneys, governing state and local housing codes, and zoning laws, divorce laws, governing the health and safety of its workers, and eliminating sexual assault on college campuses. “The strong weight of authority requires the Court to find that the state has an important interest in regulating its escrow statute.” Id. Xcaliber at 754.
Tennessee has an important interest in “regulating its [financial responsibility] statute.” But the state refuses to regulate solely parties subject to the statute, and instead runs a program of extortion serving insurance carriers. It allows its revenue commissioner to rewrite the TFRL, and in so doing create 28 abrogations and contradictions, as detailed in plaintiff’s brief in support of injunction. The EIVS program is an independent venture of the executive branch, a separate operation with only colorable connection to title 55, chapter 12.
The law charges state government with maintaining the roads and using police powers to monitor the person who’s been adjudicated irresponsible and high risk under TFRL. To falsely accuse 40,800 people a year, with many arrests, many towings of vehicles if there is a local agreement, T.C.A. § 55-12-139(C)(4), makes the streets unsafe for the public. It converts state troopers, sheriff’s deputies and municipal police into predators and bandits, enforcing § 55-12-139 illegally, contrary to the public health, safety and welfare tens of thousands of people.
An individual subject to the law fails to satisfy a court judgment or is convicted criminally for a motor vehicle offense. Safety revokes his license. Under T.C.A. § 55-12-114, the commissioner gives notice to the commissioner of revenue who “shall suspend or revoke those registrations immediately; provided, that the registrations in the person’s name must not be suspended or revoked, unless otherwise required by law, if the person provides and maintains proof of financial responsibility [“POFR”] for the length of the license’s revocation or suspension.”
The state interest is in the “ankle monitor” of each SR-22 insured, not each motor vehicle registrant. The law’s interests and the state’s interests should correspond. But since plaintiff’s administrative notice about the law in July 2023 and defendant Gerregano’s abrogation of the law, the department has refused to change course and come into compliance.
Here is a way to read the whole analysis, for God’s glory and man’s benefit.
SERVICE COPY Guano Memorandum of law supporting objection to magistrate’s recommendation
Princely warfare against principalities & powers
David runs a personal nonprofit fighting and mercy ministry. He thanks you for checks sent directly to c/o 10520 Brickhill Lane, Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379. Also at GiveSendGo.
Drug dealing Kenosha cop assisted heroin addict in breaking out my front door window of my house at 6028-25th avenue. I confronted the Cop, my heroin addicted brother, a felon who identifies as “Black” and his daughter. I presented the dirty cop with legal documents proving my identity, an POA naming me, utility bills bearing my name only.
I noted the officers badge number but was offered another as this cop claimed the badge he was wearing was not his but a “generic “ one. I asked for a supervisor but was dismissed. He advised Jeff and daughter to go with him to police station where he wrote up a false complaint and had Jeff sign it. The case was dismissed by Judge Wilk.
However, They ran off my property manager and have taken over the property and have been keeping the rent monies in violation of the Survivorship Contract.
And in IOWA, FEDERAL COURTS are engaged in RICO violations.
Witness how they unlawfully converted a Petition for Removal with Counter-Claim and Evidence into an original complaint but neglected, refused and refuses to render the conformed Summons with Complaint and Evidence upon plaintiff for service and process (Obstruction of Justice, Misprison of Felony, more):
US District court-Southern Iowa-Davenport Division, case 3:25-cv-03-SMR-SBJ, Gregory Francis Tennant vs KATHY GAYLORD, Court Administrator, STATE OF IOWA, Inc., et al
They took our granddaughter in 2017 without Due Process of law in their kangaroo “Informal Family Court Pilot Program “ without proper jurisdiction….
They are EXTORTING US!
Thank you David for Standing up to these Vatican Black Robed Poperies
As I've said before, the courts are corrupt and make up things as they go along. Your arguments are flawless, therefore CAN NOT and WILL NOT be addressed by the corrupted courts. They are there to protect the system of plunder you seek to destroy. There is no argument you could make that will be accepted, or even discussed. Maybe the best way to go is to attack every area of legitimacy the Sheriff can claim. You do that by making him provide to you the source of his authority (to engage in blatant criminal activity under color of law, but leave that part out.)
The bottom line is this. The ONLY way to move the court in the direction of the people rights and to get it to follow the law is to use only YOUR LAW, which would be the Tennessee constitution. The charge is NOT misapplying a statute. The charge is theft by deception and fraud, armed robbery, and a large assortment of 15 other direct violations of the constitution (which is itself every bit as Void for Vagueness as the statutes are).
And MOST IMPORTANTLY, you must DEMAND a Trial BY Jury, without the participation of any agents of the state other than the defendants who will be there in their private capacity not as government agents. The clerk of court (a constitutional office) and the Sheriff are REQUIRED to assemble a jury OF RANDOM PEOPLE OFF THE STREET on your behalf, provide a forum for the trial to be held, and the Sheriff serves as the overseer to make sure the Law is followed.
These criminal magistrates, especially on the federal level, just make up stuff to pretend to justify their predetermined outcome, which is you losing. Doesn't matter what the Law says, or the statutes (that are NOT law). Doesn't matter if it is right or wrong, the system must and will be protected at all times.
As much as I admire your efforts, I know from experience in reality that you will NEVER get a hearing of your facts, much a less a fair hearing, and they will fight very hard against having a legitimate Trial By Jury. Getting that proceeding, where the victims will hear the case in the Jury Box, is what you should be fighting for.