Judge suppresses coverage in traffic case upon uppity black
City court in Ft. Oglethorpe, Ga., opposes traffic case accused James' exercising right to challenge subject matter jurisdiction; 2 jails, 3rd hearing in vindictive prosecution
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Wednesday, Aug. 14, 2024โ Winston Webb is a municipal judge in Fort Oglethorpe, Ga., just south of the Georgia line from Chattanooga. Twice heโs had before him an uppity black โ โthat niggerโ as one city cop calls him โ Michael James, a model of American dignity and prescient defiance of commercial government. (1)
Judge Webb today denies a reporterโs request to use โlaptop to make hearing record, cell phone as camera, cell phone # 2 as audio recorderโ on behalf of Copperhead Radio and Tulis Report. The form used to deny the request is โRequest to use a recording device pursuant to rule 11 on recording of judicial proceedings.โ He states no reason or grounds to pare coverage of the 3 p.m. docket โtrialโ Thursday.
The court is proud on its website, saying it โprovides transparent, timely, and equal service to all who encounter the court while maintaining a high level of efficiency and accountability.โ
Mr. Jamesโ case involves racial profiling, perjury by the arresting officer Shandi Hall, his jailing in Catoosa County and extradition on a bogus Henry County, Ga., arrest warrant to a second Georgia jail, and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The last is a legal hurdle that prevents any other matter from being looked at until the state solicitor establishes the courtโs authority to hear the stateโs allegations of a crime. Mr. James is a Chattanooga truck driver jealous of a good name and clean legal record, the blighting of which affects his employment behind the wheel.
Mr. James is unbending on โno subject matter jurisdiction,โ and says he will show up โby special appearanceโ for what Judge Webb indicated earlier is a bench trial.
Mr. James had put the arresting officer on the stand at a loud, prolonged hearing over his arrest and the case against him. The sound file from this hearing is remarkable.ย
The court operates to collect fines and court costs, with no real legal work done and real harms and crimes rarely in view. โAll I need from you is a guilty plea, a not guilty plea or a request to talk with the solicitorโ about a plea deal โ this is the judgeโs mantra every docket as the citizenry is fleeced, its members glad to get out with a waiver here, a reduction of the fine there. Members of the herd โ drawn by arrest under bond or citation โ make no resistance, because thatโs how Judge Webb wants his public. Docile. Glad of his magnanimity.
No information about his legal background, credentials or career is available online.
Mr. James has filed into the corporation court his objections, including an affidavit that demands the city show cause and subject matter jurisdiction.
Mr. James on July 26 filed grievance No. 2024-606 against Judge Webb for judicial malfeasance, denied by the Judicial Qualifications Commission in Marietta. Judicial and lawyer โwatchdogโ agencies are notoriously lax, often instantly rejecting complaints. Its โerroneous dismissalโ prompted Mr. James to object in an Aug. 12 email and to demand forms on which to appeal a negative ruling.
I being a law-abiding citizen submitted 57 pages of documented EVIDENCE and 3 videos to the Director and their JQC investigator McFarland in person on May 14, 2024 at their office of employment in Marietta, Georgia.ย ย
I *** clearly state the FACTS and PROVE judicial misconduct of associate magistrate judge Shalanda Williams and appointed lawyer city administrative judge Winston Webb.ย *** I even cite the Georgia statute and the Georgia constitution [that] both associate judges violated their oath of office with wilful and wanton reckless disregard of my guarantee protected rights of due process rights, constitutional liberties, constitutional rights and civil rights.
Footnote
Mr. James says while he was in cop Shandi Hallโs cruiser under arrest Jan. 26 he overheard Lt. Robert Goolsby ask, โDid you get that nigger?โ
He needs to simply go to the court, have himself sworn in, and provide a "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit", which he will read into the record as evidence. He MUST submit evidence. This guy is pretty far along, but he must present all evidence himself. He should call out the conflict of interest in the court, and he should also testify to that to (in written form) to be entered into evidence BY HIMSELF.
If he does not enter the evidence, there will be no evidence. that is why most people lose, in spite of the kangaroo nature of the courts. Nobody ever presents evidence AS A COMPETENT WITNESS. So the court has nothing to judge on. Get you guy on the stand, and his testimony in the record.
There is no reason he can't call YOU, David, to the stand to read his Testimony into the record for him as EVIDENCE. Don't tell them you are going to do it, or file it in advance. Just have him bring someone else to court to read his testimony (present his evidence for him).