6th circuit appeal shows traffic stops commercial, improperly criminalized
Unprecedented lawsuit says traffic stop victims have right to administrative hearing before criminal prosecution, jail

CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Tuesday, July 8, 2025 — My bid to overturn the dismissal of my case in U.S. district court contains a 13,000-word brief and a 16-part appendix showing that traffic regulation has never been upon — or against — private, pleasure use of the roads.
By judicial fraud, legal fiction and a framework of official embezzlement against the public, government employees such as judges and cops (1) presumptively commercialize use of the public roads and (2) illegally criminalize equipment and “rules of the road” breaches by people using the privilege. (Amazingly, my suit’s thesis is that “driving or operating a motor vehicle is a privilege”).
My federal lawsuit against a sheriff, deputy and Hamilton County, Tenn., is without precedent in civil rights lawsuits under 40 U.S.C. § 1982, arguing that my Nov. 22, 2023, arrest by deputy Brandon Bennett was a tort because I had a right, in tootling down the road in a car with a damaged taillight, to have the accusation of the glitch made against me not by arrest, jailing and criminal prosecution, but by a contested case under privilege law within the state department of safety, issuer of the privilege.
You got your driver license from DOSHS, which regulates the transportation trades in two bodies of law, title 65, chapter 15, and title 55, motor and other vehicles, with registration falling to department of revenue.
Christian documentation on motor vehicles
Appendix of laws, 1905 to 1947 — traffic stops for carriers



Watch how ‘traffic stop’ tort works on YouTube’s Shields of Shame channel
Princely warfare against principalities & powers
David runs a personal nonprofit fighting and mercy ministry. He thanks you for checks sent directly to c/o 10520 Brickhill Lane, Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379. Also at GiveSendGo.